My first post of the year 2010! I hope everyone had a great Christmas and New Years. Things should be winding down a bit now and getting more back to normal. I have now gone back to school, this time at Portland State, to finish my Bachelor's degree in Mathematics. I will have to go for three quarters and finish this July. It should go quickly, and I can't wait to be done. More than anything, I'm just excited to have a place to lift weights again. And that means back on the Cell-tech and whey. Aside from that, the big hit over the last few weeks has been in the sports field. I have just one gripe though...the Fiesta Bowl.
What we know...BSU and TCU dominate their conference. BSU and TCU occasionally play and beat BCS conference teams.
What we don't know...BSU and TCU can compete and beat the best teams in the nation.
So then why put them in the same bowl to play each other when we could settle the dispute and watch them play two top teams in the country. The Fiesta bowl gave us nothing other than Boise State beat Texas Christian. We still have no idea whether or not those two teams can really compete with the Florida's, Alabama's, and the Texas' for a national title. The bowl selection committee ruined a perfect opportunity to either A) prove BSU and TCU are legit or B) BSU and TCU are really good teams in a weaker conference. It just seems like a cop-out to me.
Wishing everyone the best.
Signing off.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Saturday, December 19, 2009
12/19/09
About a month ago, I bookmarked a story on a young boy who was about to go blind. All I remember seeing was the headline that read, "As Little Boy Loses Sight, He Asks To See USC Football As Final Wish." You can say what you want about USC and coach Pete Carroll...over-rated, spoiled, cocky. And believe me, I'm guilty as well. But at least for this year, I think they can be looked up to. Sure, it would have been hard to tell this kid no, and any other program in the nation would've done the same given the opportunity. But USC not only granted his wish, they took him in as their family. And in a season where USC struggled (for their standards), this kid taught them more about life than the wins and losses. Check it out...
Saturday, December 12, 2009
12/12/09
NBA referees...let the discussion begin. We all love to hate them. Seriously though, the NBA needs to get their officiating figured out. Each year there is a point of emphasis: palming, hand-check, shuffling feet off catch and pump-fakes, illegal defenses, and high screens. Yet they seem to forget the basics. Watch Lebron James. Is it natural ability to go from the 3-point line to the rim with one dribble? At first glance, absolutely. But watching replays, it is clear that he is given three full steps. Last I checked, basketball only allows two and a half steps. While Lebron is merely an example, this is seen all over the league by various players.
Second basic rule lost in emphasis...the pivot foot. A few weeks ago I watched Josh Boone catch the ball at the top of the key and change his pivot foot not once, not twice, but three times. Was there a whistle? Nope. Maybe it's a given that NBA players won't change their pivot foot. Regardless, it is a fundamental rule that should be called without being emphasized.
The third basic rule lost in emphasis...over the back dunks. This is a play that will land you on ESPN's top ten plays of the day. Yet somehow, the basic rule of over-the-back is lost in translation. The shot goes up, the defensive player blocks out, yet the offensive player comes down the key, skies, and throws it down over the top of the defensive player with inside position. If the offensive player comes down with the rebound without dunking, or the rebound is lost to another player, the whistle blows with an over-the-back call. As it should. But for some reason, that rule is left out when there is a top-ten play to behold. This is once again, a basic rule left out as flare has become more important in the NBA.
There are so many "ticky tack" points of emphasis, that the basics are being left out. I'm not saying that reffing in the NBA is easy or that they do a horrible job. I just think that they are making things harder than they need to be, and instead of having so many points of emphasis that they are forced to watch, maybe go back to the basics. Keep things simple, and make the calls that break the FUNDAMENTAL rules of basketball.
Signing off.
Second basic rule lost in emphasis...the pivot foot. A few weeks ago I watched Josh Boone catch the ball at the top of the key and change his pivot foot not once, not twice, but three times. Was there a whistle? Nope. Maybe it's a given that NBA players won't change their pivot foot. Regardless, it is a fundamental rule that should be called without being emphasized.
The third basic rule lost in emphasis...over the back dunks. This is a play that will land you on ESPN's top ten plays of the day. Yet somehow, the basic rule of over-the-back is lost in translation. The shot goes up, the defensive player blocks out, yet the offensive player comes down the key, skies, and throws it down over the top of the defensive player with inside position. If the offensive player comes down with the rebound without dunking, or the rebound is lost to another player, the whistle blows with an over-the-back call. As it should. But for some reason, that rule is left out when there is a top-ten play to behold. This is once again, a basic rule left out as flare has become more important in the NBA.
There are so many "ticky tack" points of emphasis, that the basics are being left out. I'm not saying that reffing in the NBA is easy or that they do a horrible job. I just think that they are making things harder than they need to be, and instead of having so many points of emphasis that they are forced to watch, maybe go back to the basics. Keep things simple, and make the calls that break the FUNDAMENTAL rules of basketball.
Signing off.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
